Uncategorized


  • CNN's 'North Korean' Nuke Plant Shows Up Again at U.S. GOV FUNDED 'News' Site!

     

    Found at http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001189.htm . I find this highly entertaining.

     

    Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty used Photo of same Nuke Plant -- presumably from Iran -- in a N. Korea Story in Early 2004!

    Filename for that photo is 'IRAQ-Nuclear.jpg'!


    Yesterday we reported that CNN's website was using photos of the same alleged nuclear facility in two different stories about two different nuclear programs in two different countries.

    One CNN story, from last Wednesday, was on Iran's purported nuclear program; the other, from last Saturday, was on North Korea's purported nuclear program.

    The satellite photos accompanying each respective story turned out to be the same facility despite captions below each photo claiming each represented an alleged facility in the respective countries discussed in each article.

    Later in the day, after our report swept the net (topping out mid-afternoon at #6 on Technorati) CNN changed the photo in the North Korea article to a different satellite image of, apparently, a different facility purported -- as was the first one -- to be near Pyongyang, North Korea.

    No explanation was given for the error beyond a statement by CNN, in a correction box, that "an image that was incorrectly identified..."

    And now...thanks to some crack sleuthing by "EarlG", an administrator over at Democratic Underground, we've discovered yet another "news" outlet who used another photograph of that same facility -- which is apparently in Iran -- in yet another story on North Korean nukes!

    The newly discovered story is from March of 2004 and found on the Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty website!

    RFE/RL is a U.S. government funded "news" organization broadcasting over Europe!

    And to make matters even more troubling and/or confusing, the filename of the photo used in the RFE/RL story is "Iraq-nuclear.jpg"!

    Here is a screenshot from the RFE/RL story which shows the same facility as seen in the photos used with both of the CNN stories:





    Here again are the photos from the two different CNN stories (prior to the so-far-unexplained "correction" by CNN):





    And here is a side-by-side comparison of the photo from CNN's Iran story again, next to a rotated shot of the photo from RFE/RL's story on North Korea:





    So we ask again, what the hell is going on here? And, again, who are the sources for these photographs that keep running with stories on both North Korea and Iran?

    As we asked in yesterday's piece, is the source for these photos "someone who may have an interest in ginning-up fears over the two so-far unconquered players in Bush's 'Axis of Evil'?"

    Or is it all just an innocent mix-up, as some commenters have suggested?

    That "innocent mix-up" explanation certainly becomes more difficult to swallow now that the very same facility has shown up again, apparently errantly, in a story from almost a year ago, on an entirely different site, and one which is funded by the U.S. Government!

    As well, it's worth noting that RFE/RL's "corporate board of directors is composed of the nine Presidential appointees to the Broadcasting Board of Governors, which has oversight responsibility for all nonmilitary U.S. government-funded international broadcasting activities" according to their website's "Mission Statement".

    And now we must wonder why the RFE/RL photo was named "Iraq-nuclear.jpg"?! Just another "innocent mix-up"???

    In regards to CNN's two stories, we have finally reached someone at CNN who has promised to get back to us with comment on the CNN-related questions from yesterday. We will, of course, share their explanation here if and when it's received.

    We have asked RFE/RL for comment as well, and they too have promised a reply on this matter. The author of their North Korean piece, Mark Baker, RFE/RL's "deputy managing editor of the News and Current Affairs Department", apparently works out of Europe, however, and thus the time difference may delay a reply from him on this matter.

    UPDATE 2/16/05: Same photo also used on Iraq stories at RFE/RL! While all North Korea and Iraq stories have now had the photo scrubbed from their web pages! Updated story with details here...


  • Goings-On

    Well, my main website and forum are offline for the moment. Everything is backed up, but I'm being cyberstalked by a psychopath from Scotland. This character befriended me under false pretenses, claiming to be operating a website for tracking pedophiles, which I thought was a worthwhile project; so I made a special 'Noncewatch' section on my forums, and made him a moderator of that section ('Nonce' apparently being a British slang term for 'pedophile'). However, this fellow began showing signs of mental instability, beginning with unreasonable behaviour towards other forum members and culminating in irrational threats towards me, so I was eventually forced to ban him. Now this same character is claiming responsibility for getting my website shut down twice in a row, by contacting an overhead server and reporting my website as a 'race hate' website. Ironic, considering I have voice recordings of this same fellow going on about 'contributing' to my forum and 'putting some good stuff on there'. Not to mention the main web pages for the 'Noncewatch' project are hosted on the Redwatch.org website, which most folks would write off as a 'hate' site.


    This same character is also contacting the British police and telling them various lies about me, apparently he's accused me of threatening him (not sure what the alleged threat is though), and he's telling them I'm in the KKK (even though he knows I'm not even Christian) and that my site 'advocates burning Black babies'.


    Oh yes, there's crazies out there, folks. Learn more about this one at www.gomechewatch.com .

  • What's the best way to advertise a forum? I thought I'd take a screenshot, then slice it down for manageability. Now I'm trying to think up a few good slogans.

    JOIN THE RACISTANCE!

    No - too gimmicky.

    Exterminance. Because some people are just no good.

    No. Too vague.

    BE THE FIRST ON YOUR BLOCK TO REGISTER ON EXTERMINANCE!

    If that one works well, it'd have to eventually be replaced with:

    EVERYONE ELSE ON YOUR BLOCK IS ON EXTERMINANCE! WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR?

    Ugh - why did I get a nasty premonition of prison there?

  • Exposing the Real Racists

    Edgar Johnston, PhD. reviews an important new book

    Jewish Supremacism by David Duke. Published by Free Speech Press, 2003 and available from Spearhead Books at £18.00.

    In 1905, a new book was catalogued in the British Library. Its title was The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, and it claimed to be the secret minutes of Jewish élitists who planned to dominate the world. Most authorities now view The Protocols of Zion as an elaborate forgery concocted by agents of the Russian Czar.

    Over the last century since the book's release, thousands of other books have been written on what is called the 'Jewish Question'. The vast majority of them defend the Jewish people from the forces of 'Anti-Semitism', yet still the best selling book on the Jews since 1905 has been The Protocols, which has been published in most of the world's languages. According to prominent Jewish leaders in Russia, the popularity of 'The Protocols' has now been eclipsed by a new book titled Jewish Supremacism. Unlike The Protocols, this book is no forgery, for its author is proud of his work. He is the controversial American politician David Duke, a former member of the Louisiana House of Representatives.

    Jewish leaders are extremely fearful of this book. I can illustrate the cause of their concern by giving an example of David Duke's technique in exposing what he calls Jewish supremacism.

    If any prominent political person in the Western World publicly announced that Jews are frequently disloyal to nations where they live and that they view Gentiles as racially inferior, he would face excoriation as an 'anti-Semite'. Probably, he would be driven from office. Duke has no need to make such claims, for he simply quotes very prominent and powerful Jews who make his point for him.

    From the Horse's Mouth

    In the first few pages of Jewish Supremacism, Duke quotes Dr. Richard Steinlight, a former head of National Affairs for the largest Jewish organisation in the United States. Here is the quotation taken from a 2001 magazine article written by Dr. Steinlight:-

    'I'll confess it at least, like thousands of other typical kids of my generation I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months of ten formative years... I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colours, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language... and was taught the superiority of my people to the 'Gentiles' who oppressed us.

    'We were taught to view non-Jews as... people less sensitive, intelligent and moral than ourselves.'

    This method of quoting major Jewish figures and sources is used hundreds of times in Duke's book to advance his thesis that there is a powerful Jewish supremacist element in Judaism and Zionism that threatens not only the freedom of the Palestinian people but all nations, including the United States.

    Duke also uses direct quotes from the Talmud and other major Jewish sources, such as the Jewish Encyclopedia to expose a long-standing cadre of hateful, anti-Gentile Jewish supremacists. Shocking quotes are displayed from major Jewish magazines that boast of a Jewish supremacy over the media and politics of the United States. He finds disturbing and hateful words from Jewish leaders, such as Ariel Sharon, which openly support genocide, and he reveals quotations from Israeli leaders who equate Zionism and Nazism. Of course, he also cites many prominent Gentiles of historical and contemporary times, but the Jewish quotations and sources have the greatest power. Frankly, they are so convincing that Jewish leaders have sought to get the book banned in many nations.

    Interestingly, Jewish Supremacism was published first in Russia, the same nation that gave birth to The Protocols of Zion. In 2000 it quickly became a best seller throughout the entirety of the former Eastern bloc. It even sells briskly in the corridors of the Russian Duma (Parliament) and has prompted Levinsky, Goldman and other leading Jews to seek its ban under old Soviet laws forbidding 'anti-Semitism'.

    In the Autumn of 2000, Levinsky and others filed a formal complaint to the Russian Prosecutor General and asked for the book to be classified as anti-Semitic and thus illegal. After a year of close examination (they painstakingly verified all 669 of the documentations), the Russian Government shocked the Jewish community by officially declaring that the book is not anti-Semitic. Jewish members of the Duma then introduced new legislation aimed at outlawing Jewish Supremacism, but it failed by a few votes.

    Since then, the book has been sold in thousands of street corners across the breadth of the Russian Federation and has now topped an incredible 500,000 in print.

    Translated into most of the Eastern European languages, the book has won Duke many academic awards for its scholarship, including an honorary Doctorate awarded by President's University, the second largest university in the nation of Ukraine.

    Subsequently the university itself published a best-selling Ukrainian edition. In May of 2003, Free Speech Press published the English version of Jewish Supremacism, accompanied by a storm of interest and controversy. Jewish leaders are horrified that it is well on its way to becoming the best-read book in the world on Zionism.

    Smears Backfired

    Although Zionist organisations have tried to use Duke's media characterisation as a 'white supremacist' to discredit his book, so far their exploitation of his early-life involvement in a KKK group has only backfired by making the book and its author more newsworthy. Attacks by the ADL and other pro-Zionist groups have led to sensationalist news coverage, causing even greater interest and confounding those who desperately wanted Duke's book to die a quiet death.

    David Duke decries the label of white supremacist and says that while he certainly desires the preservation of his own heritage he seeks no supremacy over others. He maintains that those who scream most hatefully against him are themselves guilty of the most extreme and powerful supremacism on earth: Jewish supremacism.

    When Duke lectured in some Persian Gulf nations last year, Zionist leaders attempted to undercut his support by allegations of 'racism'. Those organised efforts had little affect on the overflow, mixed-race audiences that cheered almost his every word. As a former university professor and a writer who has lectured occasionally on behalf of the people of Palestine, I approached David Duke's book out of a curiosity elicited by the intense Zionist efforts to suppress it. Actually, I had readily accepted the negative portrayals of him I had read in the Jewish press, but I wanted to see what all the commotion was about. Why were they so anxious to ban this book and slander its author? To my great surprise I discovered a most amazing book!

    David Duke stated that he had set out with the ambitious goal of writing the most powerful exposé of Zionism ever put into print. With extreme scepticism of his ability to accomplish such a lofty goal, I began to read. Three days later, as I turned the last page, I knew that he had accomplished more than he dreamed. Rather than just assembling his facts in a dry textbook fashion, David Duke presents his thesis in the first person. It is the personal narrative of a thoughtful and enlightened young man who is sympathetic to Zionism, but is awakened to its supremacist core that not only threatens the Palestinians but his own beloved European-Americans as well. I could not find even a trace of hatred, intemperance or true anti-Semitism in this book. However, by extensive quoting of important Jewish leaders and Zionist source materials, Duke exposes a deep well of Jewish supremacist hatred against Gentiles. He points out that one is unfairly labelled an 'anti-Semite' simply for exposing the hateful pronouncements of Jewish supremacists.

    Absolves some Jews

    The book is clearly not anti-Semitic. Duke goes at length to point out that not all Jews are supremacists, and that the supremacists not only endanger the Gentile world but threaten innocent Jews by exposing them to an inevitably hostile Gentile reaction. The book is in fact dedicated to the late Dr. Israel Shahak, a Holocaust survivor and Israeli peace activist whose life was dedicated to saving both Jews and Gentiles from the dangers of 'Jewish supremacism'. David Duke cleverly turns the term 'anti-Semitic' on its head by quoting columnist Joseph Sobran's remark that the 'anti-Semite' is no longer someone who dislikes Jews; he is now simply a person whom the Jews don't like.

    Jewish Supremacism begins with David Duke's first great epiphany on the Jewish question: his learning that the Russian Revolution wasn't Russian but overwhelmingly Jewish. Using powerful documentary evidence, he shows that the Bolshevik Revolution was actually financed and led by Jews who had their own agenda against the Czar. He quotes from familiar and impeccable sources such as Winston Churchill, the dispatches of the American ambassador to Russia, the chief of British Intelligence and copious Jewish sources. For instance, he quotes a report from the National Archives of the United States showing that of the 384 members of the first Bolshevik government, there were more than 300 Jews and only 13 ethnic Russians.

    How could such an enormous fact of history be hidden? Duke asks. His rhetorical question is answered throughout the rest of this book by giving the clear evidence of the tremendous power exercised by Jewish supremacists in government, media and the academic establishment. Not only has the pre-eminent Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution and its Gulags been quietly suppressed, but also even the very existence of Jewish supremacism has been kept from public awareness. One can freely discuss the evils of white supremacism, but if one dares to expose Jewish supremacism, one will assuredly be labelled an 'anti-Semite', the ultimate term of opprobrium in modern society. In very effective arguments, Duke points out that one is not called 'anti-Christian' for exposing the excesses of the Inquisition or 'anti-Muslim' for opposing the intolerance of some extremist Moslem sects. But dare simply to quote the hateful statements of important leaders of Judaism and Zionism, and in many countries one could well wind up in prison for 'hate speech'.

    One of the fascinating themes to which David Duke repeatedly turns is the easily documented Jewish supremacist strategy of fostering extreme chauvinism among their own people while at the same time working to break down the group loyalty of the Gentiles among whom they live. Jewish leaders have long made clear that Jewish communities often have agendas that conflict with their Gentile hosts. Duke describes the struggle over those agendas as similar to the contest of two football teams. One team cultivates an extreme group loyalty through a chronic recital of Gentile persecution and an accompanying 'chosen-people' supremacist vision. The other is instilled with guilt and the idea that teamwork is immoral. The main Jewish holidays are dominated by the recounting of Gentile persecutions, and the Holocaust has now achieved almost a religious significance in Jewish life. Duke quotes many Jewish leaders proclaiming Jewish superiority and the need for the race to preserve its racial genotype. Even today, Israel will grant instant citizenship to an atheist Jew from New York, but forbids Palestinians who were born in Israel to return. Israel also forbids marriages between Jews and Gentiles.

    While Jewish supremacists have these supremacist policies for their own people, they relentlessly work to break down the immigration laws of other nations. While they preach multi-culturalism and diversity for almost every other country in which they dwell, they themselves support and expect Americans to support a Zionist State, dedicated exclusively to the Jewish people, religion and culture.

    Influence on media and government

    In chapters on Jewish influence over the American mass media and government, Duke offers extensive documentation that exceeds almost anyone's suspicions. Major Jewish sources are quoted which boast of their takeover and control of Hollywood, the news media and the most sensitive part of the Government of the United States. For instance, Duke quotes a major Israeli newspaper bragging about the fact that Jews loyal to Israel make up seven out of the eleven members of the secretive and sensitive National Security Council (NSC). The article goes on to assert that "America no longer has a government of Goyim" (Gentiles). Duke also quotes many US presidents and high government officials who have dared to speak out about the Jewish supremacy over the establishment. After thoroughly documenting Jewish supremacy in government and media, he shows how their media power is used to stifle public knowledge and understanding of this critical issue. Any legitimate criticism of Jewish Supremacism is labelled 'anti-Semitism', and the Jewish supremacists almost exclusively define that term.

    In particularly interesting passages, Duke recounts how that when he looked up the term 'anti-Semitism' in some popular encyclopaedias, he found that the articles and recommended reading lists were authored entirely by Jewish zealots! In every conflict with Gentiles, Jews are always portrayed as completely innocent while Gentiles are portrayed as totally evil. Duke suggests that the chronic portrayal of Gentiles as inherently evil toward Jews is for Gentiles the equivalent of 'blood libel' for Jews.

    Duke makes a compelling case that the nation of Israel is the doctrine of Jewish supremacism put into action. In startling documentary evidence from Israel, he shows that some of the early Zionist founders of the country readily co-operated with Nazi Germany, praised Nazi policies and claimed that their own ideology was similar. He also quotes major Jewish figures in Israel who have had the courage to condemn Israel's Nuremberg style racial laws, such as former Israeli Supreme Court member Haim Cohen, thus:-

    'The bitter irony of fate, which has led the same biological and racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infamous Nuremberg laws to serve as a basis of Judaism within the state of Israel.'

    With these kinds of powerful quotes, it is no wonder that Zionists around the world are extremely fearful of this book.

    On Israeli Terror

    Americans will find the last chapter on Israel of particular interest. Duke unveils the long Israeli record of terrorism. He documents the horrendous terror waged against the Palestinians; he also exposes Israel's long record of terrorism and treachery against its greatest benefactor, the United States! From major Jewish sources, he recounts the Israeli terrorist attacks against America in the Lavon Affair, in which Israeli agents set off bombs in American installations in Egypt in a treacherous attempt to provoke America into war against that nation. Duke presents copious evidence exposing the deliberate, murderous Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in which 34 Americans were killed and 172 grievously wounded. The terrible damage inflicted on the United States by Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard is also recounted.

    Jewish supremacy in the American media and government has suppressed any outcry against Israel's treachery. The Jewish supremacists have even been able to prevent a formal Congressional investigation into the attack on the USS Liberty. Duke makes the powerful point that millions of dollars of American aid continue to flow to Israel even after its treacherous attacks. He writes that supplying this aid is the moral equivalent of sending military aid to Japan after the attack on Pearl Harbour.

    Duke also shows how the Zionist domination of American foreign policy led directly to America's 9/11 catastrophe and a whole new series of foreign policy moves that are leading to disaster. This timely book shows the Jewish supremacist power behind the Iraq War, the manipulation of the President and the American people with false information, and the horrendous damage the war has done to our economy and even our security. Duke shows how the war is costing us hundreds of billions of dollars, continues to spill the blood of our military men and certainly increases world hatred and terrorism against America.

    In one of the most shocking chapters of his work, Duke reveals the damning evidence of Israeli treachery in the 9/11 attacks. He shows that a massive Israeli spy ring was uncovered and apprehended in the months before and after the attacks, and that some of the Mossad agents had actually monitored the hijackers, including the leader Mohammed Atta (five Israeli agents lived on his street). Warning messages of the impending attacks were sent to Israeli firms with offices both in Israel and the World Trade Centre. A group of Mossad agents was arrested on 9/11 after they were found to have been filming and cheering the attacks while they occurred. After they had been held for a few months, Zionist Michael Chertoff of the US Department of Justice released all the members of the Israeli spy ring and allowed them to return to Israel - out of the reach of Congressional 9/11 investigators.

    It is impossible to give the reader more than a glance into the depth and power of this incredible book. Practically every paragraph is a revelation. There is so much more that I could write about: detailing how the Holocaust has cynically been used as a Zionist tool in heightening Jewish solidarity and deflating criticism of Zionism and Israel; how Jewish supremacists have used immigration as a weapon of conquest, not only in Palestine but in the Western World as well. I was fascinated by Duke's expose of Sigmund Freud as a secret Jewish supremacist who thought of himself as a Hannibal destroying the foundations of the Christian church and the European family as Hannibal had sacked Rome. I could go on and on, but I will leave these discoveries to you when you read this amazing book.

    After I completed the book, I wanted to find out if it had the same affect on others as it had on me. I gave it to two long-time friends at the university where I taught for 11 years. One has conservative leanings; the other is decidedly liberal; and I would describe both of them as sympathetic to Israel. Both were so fascinated that they could hardly put the book down, and one became so engrossed that he missed his regular two o'clock class. They both agreed that Duke's book is one of the best-argued that they have ever read, and used the identical term of 'amazing' to describe it. My conservative friend commented that many quotations were so shocking that he began to check out the references and found them all to be accurate. "Hell" he said, "If only half the documents Duke cites are authentic, there is enough evidence here to start a revolution."

    Persecution of Author

    Throughout history, books that have challenged the power structure or the prevailing world-view have frequently led to the persecution of their authors. That is true of Duke as well. In the past two years since the Russian release of his book, he has been the target of intense government investigation and scrutiny. As he was finishing his English edition, he toured the Middle East and appeared on the Al-Jazeera satellite network. Newsweek magazine in November of 2002 revealed that the US State Department tried to prevent his appearance. Within 30 days of the Government's illegal attempt to violate this US citizen's free speech rights, the US Department of Justice decided to prosecute Duke on tax and financial matters.

    The official who authorised the prosecution was none other than Michael Chertoff, the same Zionist who had earlier set free the Israeli spy ring which cheered the 9/11 attacks. These Mossad agents were allowed to return to Israel, outside the reach of congressional 9/11 investigators. After reading his book, you will certainly understand why Duke has been persecuted by the Zionists in the US Government and why they seek to ban this book. His imprisonment is testimony to the power of the book!

    Perhaps the best way I can describe the reaction to David Duke's book is to use George Bush's infamous Iraq War terminology, "shock and awe." No reader of Jewish Supremacism can digest this book without being shocked by the powerful and convincing quotations and documents he assembles, and awed by his masterful writing skills in putting it all together in a fascinating, logical and well-organised literary masterpiece that will forever change your view of the world. David Duke achieved his goal of writing the most powerful exposure of Zionism ever written. But I think he has done far more than that; I think he has created the very instrument that will topple Jewish supremacism. This is more than a book; it is a path to liberation!

    The more rapidly this book is spread around the world, the faster that the Palestinians, and all the rest of us, will be set free!



    You can read more on this important book here.

  • So many anti-racists have joined a couple of our pro-White Blog rings, I decided to return the favor. Anti-Racism Blog ring, say 'hi' to your new member.


    Happy 2005, Keep Racism Alive!


  • MSN Group 'Everything Irish' targeted by interracialist spammers


    http://groups.msn.com/EverythingIrish/


    Not a very active community, but it fills me with disgust to see these vermin join just to advertise their interracial dating site on message boards intended for Eirophiles. I E-mailed the group manager, who has probably forgotten that the site exists... 


  • The Eighty-Eight Precepts - Continued

    The 29th Precept: "The concept of "equality" is declared a lie by every evidence of Nature. It is a search for the lowest common denominator, and its pursuit will destroy every superior race, nation or culture. In order for a plow horse to run as fast as a race horse you would first have to cripple the race horse; conversely, in order for a race horse to pull as much as a plow horse, you would first have to cripple the plow horse. In either case, the pursuit of equality is the destruction of excellence."


    The pursuit of equality... or the imposement of equality. It is largely the latter at work; even though a brief, casual reflection upon the concept of 'equality' will result in recognizance of the fact that there is nothing good to be gained from it, devout television-watchers everywhere swallow up and freely regurgitate the slogans and propaganda of the egalitarian myth-mongers: "We are all the same!" "We are all equal!" "We all bleed red!" and similar meaningless fallacies.


    The 30th Precept: "The instincts for racial and species preservation are ordained by Nature."


    Those races and species which did not develop, or respond to, instincts for self-preservation can be summed up with a single word: "extinct".


    The 31st Precept: "Instincts are Nature's perfect mechanism for the survival of each race and species. The human weakness of rationalizing situations for self-gratification must not be permitted to interfere with these instincts."


    This is where the modern Liberal screws itself. "The anti-racist sentiment is so strong in the crowd of peers about me!" thinks the Liberal; "Speaking out against the fallaciousness and foolishness of anti-racism will bring great pressure to bear upon me; they will stare at me, call me names, yell at me, talk behind my back and put me down... therefore, I will take up their stance as my own, and decry racism as they do; and thus, I will be accepted, even applauded, by them and I will be happy!" The Liberal who thinks thus then commits himself to the war against the existence of his own race. If you were wondering why White Nationalists refer to anti-racists as 'lemmings'... wonder no more.


    The 32nd Precept: "Miscegenation, that is race-mixing, is and has always been, the greatest threat to the survival of the Aryan race."


    What other threats are there? Warfare, of course; but every race and species must face elements and entities which war against them, and strive to survive and overcome these. And warfare drives a beset people together and can thus strengthen their unity. The Aryan race has proven excellent in handling wars. Miscegenation, on the other hand, can be quite insidious; whether the consequence of a perverted individual's willing act, or of a malign entity's designs against a race; miscegenation can often seem innoccuous and inconsequential - until it gets to the point where one looks around and realizes that his race is being replaced by a hybridized substitute.


    The 33rd Precept: "Inter-species compassion is contrary to the Laws of Nature and is, therefore, suicidal. If a wolf were to intercede to save a lamb from a lion, he would be killed. Today, we see the White man taxed so heavily that he cannot afford children. The taxes raised are then used to support the breeding of tens of millions of non-whites, many of whom then demand the last White females for breeding partners. As you can see, man is subject to all the Laws of Nature. This has nothing to do with morality, hatred, good or evil. Nature does not recognize the concepts of good and evil in inter-species relationships. If the lion eats the lamb, it is good for the lion and evil for the lamb. If the lamb escapes and the lion starves, it is good for the lamb and evil for the lion. So, we see the same incident is labelled both good and evil. This cannot be, for there are no contradictions within Nature's Laws."


    I questioned the opening statement of this Precept once, arguing that it was inter-racial compassion which truly causes the most problems; whereas different races were similar enough that they were inherently rivalrous, both requiring the same sort of territories and resources, different species were often so different as to offer the prospect of symbiotic relationships. However, upon further consideration, through examining the example of the dog, it occured to me that 'Man's best friend' was in fact more accurately 'Man's most abused slave'. Many dogs are indeed loyal and friendly, but many have been bred to such a degree of dependance upon us that they could not survive upon their own merits if commited to Nature. And most dogs are unswervingly loyal even if their masters couldn't care less if the dog was hit by a truck or afflicted with a disease - there are dogs who would happily die for men who would forget about them the next day. So, while Man has indeed benefitted from his millenia-long experience with dogs, the dog has actually gotten a pretty poor bargain in the overall deal. Their cousin, the wild wolf, is in far better shape because it has pretty much stuck with its own kind; had they the intellect to reflect upon this matter, I expect they'd be appreciative of the positive results of Man/Wolf Apartheid.




    Read David Lane's new novella, KD Rebel

  • I haven't updated in a while, having been busy with my website and forum. My forum has been gaining members at such a rate, that since I opened it on December 1st, I've steadily had one more member than there were days in the month - for example, right now it's the 26th, and my forum is at twenty-seven members. Not bad, eh?



    Meanwhile, here's a couple of cartoons from Denmark's First Patriotic Homepage:


  • The Eighty-Eight Precepts - Continued

    The 23rd Precept: "Political, economic, and religious systems may be destroyed and resurrected by men, but the death of a race is eternal."

    A simple fact. You can bring back communism, you can bring back the hippy era, you can bring back the Church, but the dinosaurs are pretty much screwed.
    One could argue that a race or species may, after going extinct, re-evolve by having its ancestral strain put through the same conditions which gave it rise in the first place; but, honestly, who wants to find out the hard way? I want to father children of my race - I don't want to croak now and hope somebody whips up an approximately similar model 12,000 years from now.


    The 24th Precept: "No race of People can indefinitely continue their existence without territorial imperatives in which to propagate, protect, and promote their own kind."

    Some facts of life boil down to simple, and often rather cold, equations. Those who harp on the wonders of diversity and third-world immigration can't seem to add two and two together; they willingly embrace that which will obviously diminish them, and probably even lead to their ultimate destruction. The human races are similar enough that they share many common needs and exhibit many common abilities; allowing an influx of such similar beings into the territory of one's own people will naturally result in competition for resources and jobs. In the end, such immigration does nothing but crowd out, suffocate, and eventually extinguish the indigenous peoples of any host nation so foolish as to embrace the immigrants.


    The 25th Precept: "A People without a culture exclusively their own will perish."

    Culture is an effulgence of race. Embracing the culture of another people only gives that other people a foot in your door; it gives them an opportunity to take advantage of your people, territory, and resources.


    The 26th Precept: "Nature has put a certain antipathy between races and species to preserve the individuality and existence of each. Violation of the territorial imperative necessary to preserve that antipathy leads to either conflict or mongrelization."

    Also referred to as 'racism', and strongly condemned and downplayed by those who would employ the popularization of mongrelization as a tool for weakening or destroying a rival - or unsuspecting victim - race.


    The 27th Precept: "It is not constructive to hate those of other races, or even those of mixed races. But a separation must be maintained for the survival of one's own race. One must, however, hate with a pure and perfect hatred those of one's own race who commit treason against one's own kind and against the nations of one's own kind. One must hate with a perfect hatred all those People or practices which destroy one's People, one's culture, or the racial exclusiveness of one's territorial imperative."

    And that is why the Rope awaits race-traitors. They have both condoned, and participated in, genocide against their race; therefore, it is necessary to treat them as the war-criminals they are.


    The 28th Precept: "The concept of a multi-racial society violates every Natural Law for species preservation."

    It occurs to me that, in a society of highly intelligent people, more than one race could live side by side, so long as they respected each other's racial purity and rightful resources. However, this is an unfeasible scenario, as there will always be people stupid and perverted enough to commit acts of miscegenation.



    So END THE HATE... SEPARATE!


    Now available: Patriot Act, by Doug Hänks; available at PatriotPublications.com.

  • Well, my Sub Zero Brownell has been producing roses... though they aren't quite the color I expected; the package showed images of a brilliant yellow rose, and the actual flowers seem more off-white with just a subtle hint of yellow. However, they smell wonderful, so I can't say I'm disappointed with them.


    Malleus, 'Kurt' from OPP, is confused as hell. After stating that he didn't want any dialogue with me, he continues to address me directly. Confused, or cowardly? A little of the former and a lot of the latter, most likely. He's written an extensive montage of snippets from my various posts across the web, thrown in a few assumptions and half-assed remarks, and shown himself to be moonlighting as a spin-doctor.

    He's also lying through his teeth when he talks about not putting up information on pro-Whites in order to aid ARA-type terrorists in attacking them. He knows exactly how these characters behave and how they would use such information.
    Full download, or streaming footage of ARA thugs attacking peaceful demonstrators; and an article on the aftermath of a cowardly attack.

    Frankly, if Kurt really did think I was some kind of dangerous psycho, and he himself harbored good intentions, would he have written an article calculated to push me over the edge? Seems to me, this behaviour of his only supports my contention that groups like the ARA and OPP have no real interest in the ethics of racism or anti-racism; they just saw an issue which many people are wired to react to with strong emotion, and decided to jump on the bandwagon, just to draw attention, sympathy, and support to their real agenda: the promotion of Marxist values and the eventual establishment of a Communist state in the West.

    What is it with these Leftists? Are they altogether devoid of brains? They argue that the former Soviet Union, China, Cuba and other such states aren't really Communist, due to the tyrants that usurped power; and true Communism is essentially Anarchy, a state of people with no government. Well, it's awfully goddamn hard not to notice what has consistently happened every time someone tried to initiate a Communist state. You'd think that a child who has burned his hand on a stovetop three times in a row would learn that placing his hand there results in something better avoided....

    People are products of Nature, just as animals are. Even if you're too uppity to consider humans to be just another variety of animal, you still must concede that humans are subject to the same laws of Nature that the animals are. Just as animals have inherent natures that are part and parcel of their form, so do humans. And it is an essential part of human nature that humans are divided into followers and leaders. Someone will take the initiative and begin to be a leader, and others will see a leader they like, and willingly follow.

    A state of anarchy, once achieved, can only continue to exist as long as its existence is enforced. Yes, even if no Soviet-style dictator arises, there must be a body of individuals absolutely dedicated to ensuring that no leader arises and takes followers under his wings. Thus, anarchy can only exist as a form of tyranny.

    There is no freedom in anarchy; only terror and suppression. People need to be free to choose a leader of their choice, and to support him as they wish. It is a fool who assumes that any autocracy or dictatorship is a tyranny simply because it is presided over by a single individual. Democracy has proven to be more tyrannic than many historic despots.

    Eventually, the anarchists will divide into two groups: those who realize the fallacy of the anarchy fantasy, and abandon it; and those who die of stupidity trying to achieve it.


    Language barriers and paranoia after a spate of petty thefts in the workplace can lead to baffling moments... Challenged "And what are you doing?" by the Chinese kitchen manager, the newly hired delivery boy exiting the washroom replies with a startled "I just took a sh*t!", only to be met with a snappy "Well, you had better put it back!"