October 9, 2004
-
The Eighty-Eight Precepts - Continued
The 23rd Precept: "Political, economic, and religious systems may be destroyed and resurrected by men, but the death of a race is eternal."
A simple fact. You can bring back communism, you can bring back the hippy era, you can bring back the Church, but the dinosaurs are pretty much screwed.
One could argue that a race or species may, after going extinct, re-evolve by having its ancestral strain put through the same conditions which gave it rise in the first place; but, honestly, who wants to find out the hard way? I want to father children of my race - I don't want to croak now and hope somebody whips up an approximately similar model 12,000 years from now.
The 24th Precept: "No race of People can indefinitely continue their existence without territorial imperatives in which to propagate, protect, and promote their own kind."
Some facts of life boil down to simple, and often rather cold, equations. Those who harp on the wonders of diversity and third-world immigration can't seem to add two and two together; they willingly embrace that which will obviously diminish them, and probably even lead to their ultimate destruction. The human races are similar enough that they share many common needs and exhibit many common abilities; allowing an influx of such similar beings into the territory of one's own people will naturally result in competition for resources and jobs. In the end, such immigration does nothing but crowd out, suffocate, and eventually extinguish the indigenous peoples of any host nation so foolish as to embrace the immigrants.
The 25th Precept: "A People without a culture exclusively their own will perish."
Culture is an effulgence of race. Embracing the culture of another people only gives that other people a foot in your door; it gives them an opportunity to take advantage of your people, territory, and resources.
The 26th Precept: "Nature has put a certain antipathy between races and species to preserve the individuality and existence of each. Violation of the territorial imperative necessary to preserve that antipathy leads to either conflict or mongrelization."
Also referred to as 'racism', and strongly condemned and downplayed by those who would employ the popularization of mongrelization as a tool for weakening or destroying a rival - or unsuspecting victim - race.
The 27th Precept: "It is not constructive to hate those of other races, or even those of mixed races. But a separation must be maintained for the survival of one's own race. One must, however, hate with a pure and perfect hatred those of one's own race who commit treason against one's own kind and against the nations of one's own kind. One must hate with a perfect hatred all those People or practices which destroy one's People, one's culture, or the racial exclusiveness of one's territorial imperative."
And that is why the Rope awaits race-traitors. They have both condoned, and participated in, genocide against their race; therefore, it is necessary to treat them as the war-criminals they are.
The 28th Precept: "The concept of a multi-racial society violates every Natural Law for species preservation."
It occurs to me that, in a society of highly intelligent people, more than one race could live side by side, so long as they respected each other's racial purity and rightful resources. However, this is an unfeasible scenario, as there will always be people stupid and perverted enough to commit acts of miscegenation.
So END THE HATE... SEPARATE!
Now available: Patriot Act, by Doug Hänks; available at PatriotPublications.com.
Comments (33)
Wow. I hate white people.
"You've probably figured out by now that your ego is one of your biggest enemies." Now isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? Remember, I've read your posts. Even if they are tongue in cheek, they do exhibit somewhat of a Napoleon complex.
Oh hell, Bill, I came to that conclusion long before I ran accross you, though I would pinpoint my arrogance and a tendency to act first, think later. Still, I am able to be reflective about my weaknesses and I can usually keep them in check, though not always.
"Here's another one: Your propensity for making assumptions." The finger can be pointed in the other direction as well, don't you think? One of the reasons why many posters on the OPP forums find your expose of the site to be amusing is how far off the mark you are. Though it might serve you to characterize anti-racists as violent anarchists, it simply isn't true in the vast majority of cases, yours truly included. Are there some who do use or support violence? Sure, but the question should be whether they are in the mainstream of the anti-racist movement? Just as it would be simplistic of me to characterize all members of the right as vicious, mindless, "Nazi boneheads," your representation of the side that I represent is equally simplistic.
"Do you sincerely believe I'm on the wrong path? The fact is, Kurt, I have seen a few things which make it impossible to turn back." And I've seen and experienced things that makes it impossible for me to view racism as a reasonable worldview. Racism, anti-Semitism, sexism, and most other such "ism's" are examples of intellectual laziness. You may choose to disagree.
Finally, and speaking of assumptions, I personally don't think that racists are stupid. Many are mental midgets (just as in the general population), but individuals such as the late William Pierce, Paul Fromm, Phillipe Rushton, and David Duke are fiercely intelligent, and most are at least of average intelligence. That said, intelligence doesn't mean that one is correct. I never considered you to be stupid, and in fact you proved yourself to be far more intelligent than I had given you credit for initially (and I'm not talking about how you figured out who I was). That said, just because your intelligent, it doesn't mean that you're correct in your thinking.
You have my email. You wish to continue this discussion, drop me a line. I'll admit that I'm curious to know why you chose the path that you have currently decided upon, since I do know that the reasons why people turn to this ideology are often very complex. Again, your choice.
go fuck yourself skinhead.
try communism
Where is that speetch from? Very disturbing.
Don't listen to the haters. Either kikes or brainwashed wiggers.
Quoth MillenniumBoy, "try communism".
From an earlier entry of mine...
What is it with these Leftists? Are they altogether devoid of brains? They argue that the former Soviet Union, China, Cuba and other such states aren't really Communist, due to the tyrants that usurped power; and true Communism is essentially Anarchy, a state of people with no government. Well, it's awfully goddamn hard not to notice what has consistently happened every time someone tried to initiate a Communist state. You'd think that a child who has burned his hand on a stovetop three times in a row would learn that placing his hand there results in something better avoided....
People are products of Nature, just as animals are. Even if you're too uppity to consider humans to be just another variety of animal, you still must concede that humans are subject to the same laws of Nature that the animals are. Just as animals have inherent natures that are part and parcel of their form, so do humans. And it is an essential part of human nature that humans are divided into followers and leaders. Someone will take the initiative and begin to be a leader, and others will see a leader they like, and willingly follow.
A state of anarchy, once achieved, can only continue to exist as long as its existence is enforced. Yes, even if no Soviet-style dictator arises, there must be a body of individuals absolutely dedicated to ensuring that no leader arises and takes followers under his wings. Thus, anarchy can only exist as a form of tyranny.
There is no freedom in anarchy; only terror and suppression. People need to be free to choose a leader of their choice, and to support him as they wish. It is a fool who assumes that any autocracy or dictatorship is a tyranny simply because it is presided over by a single individual. Democracy has proven to be more tyrannic than many historic despots.
Eventually, the anarchists will divide into two groups: those who realize the fallacy of the anarchy fantasy, and abandon it; and those who die of stupidity trying to achieve it.
Waffen SS Soldat, that speech was rendered by Khalid Abdul Muhammad, a former member of the NOI who got kicked out and whom I believe is now deceased.
1) u think u white wel 1 u from canda..that low u down man
2) u have freinds?? y u soo obbsive about jews?? huh?? like what heck dont u have freinds to go thm and hang out just be with them?
comment in my xanga not urs
^
What the fuck is that kike saying?
Hard to say. Point one appears to say that I'm low-down because I'm Canadian. I had no idea that Canadians were known to be such snakes in the grass. Point two appears to be some sort of psychoanalytical tirade. They haven't smartened up since Freud, have they?
i just say u belive in somthung dead..
like i dont belive in bible nd stuff its the same crap
semen1234: "i just say u belive in somthung dead"
Oh, really? What 'somthung dead' do I believe in?
As far as I'm concerned, the White race is still ALIVE, and I shall fight to see that it remains so.
I'd agree that the Bible is crap. I prefer Natural Law.
natural law is need to rule the workd no religion crap..
but my law isnt ur law..
my law is al "races" so called r the equile ..
so y u soo hate jews nd niggers ?? give me 2 relly good resones that u belive in ...
semen1234, you really need to improve your English skills... try posting again and clarifying what you were trying to say.
PainfullyUncool, it is the Bible and Christianity that fills you with hatred. Christianity destroyed the Roman Empire, and now it's destroying the West. Christianity knows nothing but death and destruction; what kind of religion worhips a man who was beaten and killed? You surround yourself with images of death and defeat. Unless you change your ways, you will either live a long and miserable life, or you will wind up commiting suicide.
What's the point of people complaining on our own personal blogs? If they don't like it, simply don't read it. Fucking left wing, liberal kikes.
88
I'm willing to listen to the opposition. I used to be a left-winger myself... I figure, if I can change, they can too.
One question: Why does your hatred for Jews run so deep? Did Jews create a holocaust and kill 6 million of your people? Did Jews blame you for the Black Plague of Death and slaughter tens of thousands of your people? Have Jews persecuted you and kicked your ancestors out of almost every civilization throughout history? I'm a Right-Wing Jewish KIKE and proud of it, and from all the things you've done to us, we should hate YOU so much. I see you're against Christianity, but I assume that your "White Race" and ancestors have lived through Christianity. And, believe it or not, your "White Race" Christianity originated from Judaism. So please, answer my question. . . Why do you hate Jews at such a great magnitude? Tell me, please. Maybe you'll convince me to hate myself.
ChayalZahalIsraeli: Why does your hatred for Jews run so deep?
I hate the Jews because they have brought my race to the brink of destruction. Jews are the progenitors of neo-Liberalism. Jews are behind multiculturalism and the promotion of miscegenation, which are actively diminishing my race. Jews are behind the 'feminist' movement, which alienates women from their natural roles in life and encourages them to spit on men and on the concept of the nuclear family; it encourages women to become lesbians or to view abortion as acceptable.
You mention getting kicked 'out of almost every civilization throughout history'. Jews are famous for that, aren't they? Anyone who has been kicked out of every nation in Europe one or more times, or who has been persecuted and hated for thousands of years, must be doing something wrong. Or do you think non-Jews are rabid animals who just up and start persecuting and hating Jews for something to do?
Christianity, much like Judaism and Islam, was created by Semites. Christianity weakened the Roman Empire and hastened its destruction; Christianity is doing the same thing in Western Civilization today. Christianity is Jewish poison, and we'd be much better off without it.
Convince you to hate yourself? If you are a Jew, how would either I or you benefit from having you hate yourself? My place is with my people, and your place is with yours. So continue to be a right-wing Jew and proud of it. Fight for your people as I will fight for mine. The Jews will continue trying to maintain their dominance and enslavement of the world, and White Nationalists will continue to struggle against you.
Your time is coming, Jude. More and more people are waking up the world over. More and more people are becoming enraged at the way you Jews play with human lives and with the nations of the world. More and more people are becoming resolved to end the Jewish despot of our world.
^
Many Catholics around the world, including the Vatican helped the Nazi Officers escape and gave them refuge after World War II. Many thousands were able to evade the Zionist man hunters thanks to Catholics.
Species go extinct, races merge or diverge. A white black mix could theoretically propogate a full white genotypic offspring.
Hate is a virus spread by those not strong enough to resist its skills of fooling the immune system.
Yeah, I don't deny that there have been many good Christians in the world; but the fact that they were good is more likely in spite of their religion, rather than due to their religion.
Walabe84, your rhetoric is hollow and insubstantial. Liberalism is a disease that weakens minds and rots society. Hate is a natural response to anything that poses a threat to the individual, to the family, or to the society. Hating one's enemies is sensible. Ignoring or embracing that which would destroy you is utter foolishness, foolishness that leads to untimely death.
The Liberal embraces the alien. The Liberal embraces its own destruction.
Liberalism is the laughing face of lunacy.
Liberal? Because I choose not to hate anyone? Quite the blanket and uninformed statement I would think.
Liberal? Because I have conservative beliefs that don't match up with your cloudy belief of racial superiority?
Liberal? Because you can't label not hating non-whites anything else?
Liberal would be the mis-label of the century on me good sir.
A fascist is only a communist who choose slightly differnent governmental schemes. Nazis were fascists. Nazis believed in racial superiority. Take out the hate, illogical conclusions, and misguided anger from racism/fascism and you have me, a true conservative. What America was founded upon.
True Conservatism is based upon sensibility. The 'Neo-Cons' have forsaken sensibility. Would a true Conservative support giving billions of American taxpayer's dollars to Israel, thereby feeding the Israeli war of terror against the Palestinians, and making America a target of interest to Palestinian sympathizers? That is far from sensible, and far from conservative.
'Cloudy belief of racial superiority'? Maybe you should do some research before you talk. I'm a separatist, not a supremacist. 'Hating non-Whites'? The only non-Whites I happen to hate are Jews. I feel no hatred towards the various other non-White races. 'A fascist is only a communist who choose slightly differnent governmental schemes'? Far from it. The pipe-dream of communism is essentially a state of anarchy where the rule is 'from each according to their abilities; to each according to their needs' - a rule which necessarily omits the consideration of human nature. By contrast, fascism is simply the rule of a leader who is dedicated to the welfare of his people. Fascism is comparable to monarchy, or to tribalism; a people, and a leader. Fascism is in my opinion far preferrable to the gross farce of 'democracy'.
Yes, a conservative wouldn't support Israel monetarily, a 'neo-con' i am not. I didn't vote for W.
A separatist vs. a supremacist. Why do you want to separate the races? To preserve yours, right? Why preserve it? Because you think it is worth preserving. Why is it worthy of preserving and not worth mixing? Because you believe that your race should be preserved above all else? Am I right, if im not, please tell me, for I probably have jumped the gun on my comment above, for I don't know all of your beliefs. Now, if you didn't think your race was better (unlike a supremacist), then why would you mind if your race mixed and 'evolved'? Would that mix be any less important or as good than the pure-breed of white?
Communism in its practiced form is few leaders and forced labor and obedience in the name of the greater good of mankind. Fascism is a few leaders with forced military and nationalism in the name of the greater good of the nation. Violence thrown in for good measure.
Do you hate the Jews as race, or religion?
well i work on my english but hebrew rulz! kus ima shleah ya ben zona shtekabl sartan
well what is 88 that u all write in the xanga??
88 means heil hitler.
Exterminance, Jews are trying to enslave and dominate the rest of the world? There is only one Jewish country in the entire world, and it's the size of Maryland! I don't know why supremacists obtain the myth that Jews control all the money and the world. Yes, you won't see many homeless Jews. This is because we actually have the IQ and the brains to go out and finance ourselves.
Also, please do not talk about Judaism before you know what it's all about. We are not behind the "Feminist" movement. If you know something about Jewish law, they are one of the religions that give the most respect to men rather than women. Women are not allowed to touch the torah (Old Testament), and both sexes are segregated when they go to temple. Women on the second floor, men on the first. Women are supposed to stay at home and raise the children, while the men support the family financially. This is not a nuclear family? Also, Jewish law is totally AGAINST abortion. Abortion is considered MURDER and totally unacceptable.
Jews are not trying to dominate the world. Get that through your head. We want what we already have, Israel, a small Jewish nation. If Indians would bomb you everyday like the Palestinians do in Israel, would you give them land back? If anything, Islam is the religion that is attempting to bring your race to the brink of destruction. If you read the Koran, which I have, the main theme is to live the sword. They look at you as an infidel, and want to conquer the world.
I'm a Jude and my end is not near. There will never be another holocaust. We will never be led like sheep to the slaughter, no matter how many Nazis like you are out there. We will fight for our existence.
Walabe84: "Now, if you didn't think your race was better (unlike a supremacist), then why would you mind if your race mixed and 'evolved'?"
Race-mixing is in fact the opposite of evolution. It was living in diverse environments that divided the common ancestors of the modern races into their distinct separate varieties. Bringing these divergent races back together and mixing them destroys thousands of years of evolution. The Negroid and non-Negroid races are separated by a hundred thousand years of evolution; and of the non-Negroid races, the European and Asian races are separated by forty thousand years of evolution. In just a few short centuries, the madness of 'multiculturalism' is destroying all that evolution and diversity.
All race-mixing is wrong. The only reason a Black man is born is because his Black father and Black mother came together and had him for a son. And the only reason they were born Black is because each of them likewise had a Black father and a Black mother... and it went on like that for thousands upon thousands of years. Now, if that Black man goes against all those thousands of years of heritage and takes a White woman as his mate, he spits in the face of his father, he spits in the face of his mother, he spits in the faces of all his ancestors and heritage. And he brings a child into the world who has no full share in his father's heritage, nor a full share in his mother's heritage, but only half a share in this heritage and half a share in that heritage; he brings a child into this world who does not truly belong to any established ethnic group. He brings an alien into a strange environment.
I tend to say that I hate the Jews as a race, but it would probably be more accurate to say that I hate them on a cultural basis, as it is Jews behaving like Jews that incites my hatred for them.
semen1234, do you live in Israel? If so, your linguistic skills are probably adequate. It's also the best place for a proud Jew to reside, in my opinion.
'88' is used by many to mean 'Heil Hitler', the 8s signifying 'H' as the eighth letter of the alphabet, but when I use it, I use it to refer to the Eighty-Eight Precepts.
ChayalZahalIsraeli: "Jews are trying to enslave and dominate the rest of the world?" No, they already have enslaved and dominated it. "There is only one Jewish country in the entire world, and it's the size of Maryland!" Israel is little more than a trophy for the Jewish ego. There are Jewish rulers in every Western, predominantly-White nation. Some refer to these nations as 'ZOG' - Zionist-Occupied Government - but I prefer to use the term 'JOG', Jew-Occupied Government. White leaders like President George Bush, Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Paul Martin, are little more than figureheads, puppets dancing to the tune of the Jews in their political cabinets.
The reason I prefer to use the term 'JOG' rather than 'ZOG' is because not every problematic Jew is a Zionist. The Zionists represent the political right of the Jews, the ones who strongly support Israel. But the non-Zionist Jews are the ones who spread the decadent creed of Liberalism everywhere they go. Jews are indeed highly intelligent - they know that it is Conservatism which binds a people together and makes a nation strong; and they know that Liberalism rots the fabric of society. And that is why the Jewess Gloria Steinem spreads her poison, teaching women that they need men 'like a fish needs a bicycle', setting the White man and White woman at war with one another. That is why the plague of Liberalism has taught young White women that abortion is acceptable - that a woman should value her right to sexual promiscuity above human life itself.
Yes, fight for your existence, demon. My people will fight for ours and we will prevail over you. The fantasy of the 'Holocaust' your people invented and force my people to believe in will become a reality because you have built it up so much. Your sick minds invented it, and your will to defend its legitimacy will bring it to reality. You will burn in the very fires you dreamed up to instill a sense of guilt in the Gentiles.
Thank you for replying the way you did to my comment.
According to what you said about Communism's lack of importance due to over population, yes, that is what I'm saying. But, when replying with you said about Democracy, I'm assuming your refering that Democracy is working in the US. Well, one argument could be brought up as to wheather or not we even have a true Democracy, for the same reasons as to wheather not China is a true Communist state, but with "different" outcomes.
Who's to say that Democracy is working when Capitalism is claiming the freedom of people who have the misfortune to be subject to a corprate money hungry buisness man's plant shutting down, causing them to lose their job, and maybe in the long run their family, or even their home. Also, that plant is shutting down so they can have a different plant in a different country with no labour laws, extremely low pay, ect. I'm just questioning whether or not Democracy is really all that much more successful. Yes we're getting by, but isn't Cuba? Castro has caused some of the highest literacy raisings ever recorded in that country.
Also, when I said I was a Leftie, I said I was one according to what you considered them. But now you proved me wrong. I still haven't established a stable philosophy, but I can firmly say I have no hippi values. Yes, peace, but I am no close-minded fool who drifts through life holding picket signs and pretending I'm doing something to make a difference. Back to the Leftie label, I consider myself at a state with no "political-wing", as do you self, apparently.
I believe that I do value freedom, and after this i hope you could consider me as someone who is as abstract as you described. Even still, I won't labely myself liberal, out of fear that I would be confined to a certain thinking.
You say your beliefs are based on science. What science proves, or at least supports what your saying?
Once again, I'm just asking questions.
Race Mixing doesn't destroy evolution or promotion of optimal characteristics, but improves it. The "negroid" race (as you put it) is well known for it's athletic abilities, as is the asian race for it's intelliegence. If one were to mix those two races, you could theoretically take the best of both races and form a 'more' smarter and 'more' faster race. That is a component of promoting evolution. Having one race disappear makes no difference to nature, for race is only a modification (differentiation) of the species.
What you fail to realize is that different races are in the same species. Mainly by the plan fact that when they mate they produce vible offspring who are not sterile. This negates the 'supposed' destruction of evolution by racial mixing, for their was no evolution as of yet, but simply modification and adaptation. For if we truely had evolved, blacks and whites couldn't reproduce.
A key compontent of evolution is diversity. Without new alleles coming into the population, the population remains stagnant and loses the ability to form mutations that could possibly be beneficial.
Reality tells us that most races Won't interbreed, but that only a select few do. If one were to step outside of their race, and then their offspring mate with one within either race, that race could gain an advantageous allele.
As for the Jews: "Jews behaving like Jews that incites my hatred for them.", what if a Jew were to not act like a jew, or a gentile act like a jew. Would you hate the gentile and befriend the jew without pre-knowledge of their race or religion?
SearchingForBeliefs: "You say your beliefs are based on science. What science proves, or at least supports what your saying?"
That's a rather broad question, which thing I'm saying are you referring to? Science is a many-faceted thing which underlies pretty much any topic I can discuss.
Walabe84: "Race Mixing doesn't destroy evolution or promotion of optimal characteristics, but improves it. The "negroid" race (as you put it) is well known for it's athletic abilities, as is the asian race for it's intelliegence. If one were to mix those two races, you could theoretically take the best of both races and form a 'more' smarter and 'more' faster race. That is a component of promoting evolution." No, that's not evolution, for the traits you describe - athletic abilities and intelligence - already exist in each race, and therefore have already evolved. The elements which drove these traits to evolve tend to be enmeshed in the environments in which each race evolved. Now, if you breed the two groups together, there's no guarantee that the optimal traits of each race will propagate. You could just wind up with offspring who combine the lower intelligence of one race with the athletic deficiencies of the other. In pure evolution, you have a single race inhabiting a certain environment, and survival favors those individuals who exhibit stronger favored traits than other individuals. For example, if you live in a great flat plain inhabited by man-eating lions, those who can run faster and for longer distances will survive, while the slower and the shorter-winded will get eaten by lions. Eventually, the race that inhabits this plain will be largely composed of swift long-distance runners. But if you were to take these people and begin interbreeding them with members a completely different race, the running skill would no longer be emphasized as a tarit - unless the new mixed breed were still being exposed to wild lions, thus continually weeding out the slower individuals. As David Duke pointed out in My Awakening, civilization has a tendency to promote dysgenics, as it shields us from the purifying rigors that Mother Nature would normally exert upon us. In a decadent civilization that does not practice eugenics - worse, in a Liberal society that coddles its weak and unfit - the process of evolution is not merely halted, it is reversed. No longer do the fittest survive; the unfit proliferate, and the fittest become a great rarity.
"What you fail to realize is that different races are in the same species." What makes you think I fail to realize that? I am more than aware that race-mixing produces fertile offspring - that is part of the problem. Because miscegenants can reproduce, they contribute to the crowding-out of pure races.
"A key compontent of evolution is diversity. Without new alleles coming into the population, the population remains stagnant and loses the ability to form mutations that could possibly be beneficial." Incorrect. Evolution comprises the forces of Nature selecting one mutation in a group above another mutation in the same group. Giraffes have long necks because they could reach higher leaves than other animals; the individuals of their ancestral group who did not develop the longer necks failed to proliferate becasue they could not compete with the plethora of other animals that were also feeding off the lower leaves of trees. It wasn't because some other long-necked species came along and started mixing with the ancestral giraffe strain. Diversity does not trigger evolution; it is the product of evolution.
"As for the Jews: "Jews behaving like Jews that incites my hatred for them.", what if a Jew were to not act like a jew, or a gentile act like a jew. Would you hate the gentile and befriend the jew without pre-knowledge of their race or religion?" Generally speaking, Jews tend to behave like Jews with few exceptions. This is largely due to evolutionary strategy which has promoted the survival of those Jews who excell in deception and manipulation. There are many non-Jews who behave like Jews - Shabboth Goyim, all; servants of the Jews and no better than Jews.
"Now, if you breed the two groups together, there's no guarantee that the optimal traits of each race will propagate. You could just wind up with offspring who combine the lower intelligence of one race with the athletic deficiencies of the other. In pure evolution, you have a single race inhabiting a certain environment, and survival favors those individuals who exhibit stronger favored traits than other individuals."
Present examples: What are white separatists doing these days (those vowing to remain racial pure)? Are they flurishing in the academic world? Are they gaining in the athletic world? Are you better and happier for being racially pure? I don't know about where you live, but where I live, there is a large surge of Indian/Asian students at my college. That is neither good or bad in my eyes, but just a fact. There is an absurd amount of African Americans in the NBA, NFL, MBL, and now even the PGA. Whites still control most companies, but that is slowly changing. Why? Well, one could blame affirmative action and other 'liberal' run programs, but if whites were truly superior, they could rise above such disadvantages.
It seems in America, and I guess canada (that's where your from, n'est pas?) many races have survival factors stronger than others. You say that mixing races may not neccesarily produce better populations, but within a race, there is no guarantee to produce better 'pure' races, say, within the white race. Are we a better race than we were when there was no possible race mixing?
"No, that's not evolution, for the traits you describe - athletic abilities and intelligence - already exist in each race, and therefore have already evolved."
Traits already existing doesn't negate evolution. Evolution is perpetuated by those with athletic abilities and intelligence being more fit, thus producing more offspring. The trait for fast runners doesn't disappear if it is mixed with a trait for intelliegence.
In America for example, the terrain and society doesn't change (there isn't a lion and no-lion area). You can't always relate animal adaptation to human adaptation, for animals are usually bound by resources and have limits on their ranges. Humans have limitless ranges. Birds/lizards/giraffes....etc of different 'races' (different kinds within the same species) don't mix because they can't. If they could, they could theoretically gain better traits just as easily as they could if they stayed within the race.
Racial purity is only advantageous in social situations that are contrived and put upon us by those with such purity.
You should update soon.
88
Join a good group @ Xanga:
http://www.xanga.com/groups/group.aspx?id=783618
Jews manipulate and occupy governments? I'm interested to know how this works when there are only few Jews holding cabinet positions. The only Jew to be nominated to run for US Vice President was Joe Lieberman. You insist that Jews spread liberalism? He even is a CONSERVAIVE democrat. How many U.S. senators are Jewish? Close to none. How many representatives are Jewish? Close to none. Please tell me how they still successfully manipulate and operate governments under "JOG"?
Comments are closed.