August 16, 2004
-
Well, my Sub Zero Brownell has been producing roses... though they aren't quite the color I expected; the package showed images of a brilliant yellow rose, and the actual flowers seem more off-white with just a subtle hint of yellow. However, they smell wonderful, so I can't say I'm disappointed with them.
Malleus, 'Kurt' from OPP, is confused as hell. After stating that he didn't want any dialogue with me, he continues to address me directly. Confused, or cowardly? A little of the former and a lot of the latter, most likely. He's written an extensive montage of snippets from my various posts across the web, thrown in a few assumptions and half-assed remarks, and shown himself to be moonlighting as a spin-doctor.
He's also lying through his teeth when he talks about not putting up information on pro-Whites in order to aid ARA-type terrorists in attacking them. He knows exactly how these characters behave and how they would use such information.
Full download, or streaming footage of ARA thugs attacking peaceful demonstrators; and an article on the aftermath of a cowardly attack.Frankly, if Kurt really did think I was some kind of dangerous psycho, and he himself harbored good intentions, would he have written an article calculated to push me over the edge? Seems to me, this behaviour of his only supports my contention that groups like the ARA and OPP have no real interest in the ethics of racism or anti-racism; they just saw an issue which many people are wired to react to with strong emotion, and decided to jump on the bandwagon, just to draw attention, sympathy, and support to their real agenda: the promotion of Marxist values and the eventual establishment of a Communist state in the West.
What is it with these Leftists? Are they altogether devoid of brains? They argue that the former Soviet Union, China, Cuba and other such states aren't really Communist, due to the tyrants that usurped power; and true Communism is essentially Anarchy, a state of people with no government. Well, it's awfully goddamn hard not to notice what has consistently happened every time someone tried to initiate a Communist state. You'd think that a child who has burned his hand on a stovetop three times in a row would learn that placing his hand there results in something better avoided....
People are products of Nature, just as animals are. Even if you're too uppity to consider humans to be just another variety of animal, you still must concede that humans are subject to the same laws of Nature that the animals are. Just as animals have inherent natures that are part and parcel of their form, so do humans. And it is an essential part of human nature that humans are divided into followers and leaders. Someone will take the initiative and begin to be a leader, and others will see a leader they like, and willingly follow.
A state of anarchy, once achieved, can only continue to exist as long as its existence is enforced. Yes, even if no Soviet-style dictator arises, there must be a body of individuals absolutely dedicated to ensuring that no leader arises and takes followers under his wings. Thus, anarchy can only exist as a form of tyranny.
There is no freedom in anarchy; only terror and suppression. People need to be free to choose a leader of their choice, and to support him as they wish. It is a fool who assumes that any autocracy or dictatorship is a tyranny simply because it is presided over by a single individual. Democracy has proven to be more tyrannic than many historic despots.
Eventually, the anarchists will divide into two groups: those who realize the fallacy of the anarchy fantasy, and abandon it; and those who die of stupidity trying to achieve it.
Language barriers and paranoia after a spate of petty thefts in the workplace can lead to baffling moments... Challenged "And what are you doing?" by the Chinese kitchen manager, the newly hired delivery boy exiting the washroom replies with a startled "I just took a sh*t!", only to be met with a snappy "Well, you had better put it back!"
Comments (12)
Wow, your sources are solargeneral (hate site) and longcountyrebel, a Stormfront regular. And did you notice that solargeneral carefully edited the clip? I believe you are smarter than that.
Or perhaps not. Either way, I have a belief that "racialists" deep down believe they are the villians. The racist skinhead scene is full of skins trying to out-villian each other, trying to be offensive, knowing full well they are on the wrong side, but hey, they want to be. The people that actually believe they are on the right side, I'm sure could be medically diagnosed as being mentally disturbed or having some mental problem.
Oh yeah, in this picture of you
http://hosting.skadi.net/Exterminance/images/rightsideface.jpg
-- you look like a skinny Goldberg. You know, that Jewish wrestler.
http://www.webcom.com/collectr/wr/images/wpgoldbergb.jpg
Hey! Maybe you're one of those ZOG infiltrators I often hear about from your crowd. Wow!
Villains? You're insane. Our basic desires are 1) to survive and 2) to be left alone. What drives us to become racial activists are the forces that seek to extinguish us, and the immigrant hordes who can't stand the environments they make in their own countries and come swarming into ours to bog us down.
How the hell does wanting to survive and be left alone make someone a villain?!?!?!?
You're so silly. You're in Fort St. John, a town with an overwhelming white population with a white mayor in a province ran by a white man, and even furthermore, in a country ran by a white PM. Yet, you complain you're struggling to survive in this dastardly white world. You use words like genocide and oppression, when I'm pretty sure you have no inkling of what they really mean and feel like. Even more hilarity: you complain of immigrants, but work for one, thereby reinforcing their importance to your town's economy. As for my villians comment, I can tell you haven't spent any time with racist skinheads. If you ever move to a place where there is a racist skinhead population, I can only estimate how strong is your tolerance for idiotic boneheads. But I thank God for em! They're the reason most people realize they're playing for the bad team.
Leftists have some really bizarre ideas. The other day one said, "It's racist to see a person's race, and it's racist not to see a person's race." What the hell?
blahblahblah123B, Fort St. John is seething with non-Whites. Whites might be a majority here, but it's not always apparent. And most of them are shabboth goyim; television-worshiping Liberals, which means they willingly embrace the alien into their own midst, not understanding the consequences of that action.
My working for a non-White does not 'reinforce their importance to the town's economy'. It's a simple necessity; one must survive in whatever environment they find themselves in; and against my will, I find myself in a multiculturalist environment. If survival entails being employed by a non-White, so be it. When you find yourself dunked in an ocean, it's sink or swim.
Genocide. You can see it happen all around you even before you yourself are slain. Oppression? My website on Geocities just got deleted, possibly because of my pro-White views, which are code-named 'hate' by those who wish ill to the White race. The more freely I speak, the more I'm told to shut up. I could get jailed for speaking my views. Yes, I do know what oppression is.
By the way, among the things I delete comments for is offensive manner of speech. Since I've left your last three messages up, how about trying a little civility in your composition?
Yup, tears of the nephilim, double standards are the foundations of Liberalism. It's racist to see a person's race, if they're non-White and doing something wrong; but if wrong is being done to a non-White, their not being White increases the magnitude of the crime. And, if a White person is doing something wrong, it's partly because they're White; but if wrong is being done to a White, the race of the victim must remain a non-issue. Thus, in the eyes of the Leftist, "It's racist to see a person's race, and it's racist not to see a person's race."
No, you do not get it. You complain of immigrants and that they are "oppressing" you, yet work for one. You DO reinforce their importance to FSJ's economy. You are a complete hypocrite. You could easily survive without working for a Chinese restaurant, but yet you *choose* to. It's hilarious to think it's a do-or-die situation in all places, Canada. Please, give your few readers some credit. As for your website on geocities, that is hardly a symptom of oppression. If we assume your beliefs are the reason for its deletion, it is quite apparent you did not read the TOS when signing up for a geocities account. They do not allow many things: kiddy porn, hate speech, etc. This is a consequence of giving free space to people; you read their rules and regulations and either decline to follow or agree to follow them. If you don't agree with them, don't sign up with them! Geocities does not represent a government nor anything that could be considered "ZOG", they are a corporation whose name does not want to be associated with kiddy porn, neo-nazism, etc. It's quite easy to grasp, really, although I don't logically agree with them. I wouldn't have deleted your site. However, in a capitalistic system, we should expect these circumstances.
I've been to FSJ a couple of times; FSJ is a little town with an overwhelming white population with a small segment of minorities. Additionally, according to your beliefs, where are you going to tell the Natives to go?
As for your reply to nephilim, where exactly does this take place? From my personal observations, I've seen Canadian media mention "native criminals" or "criminals from ____ background" but have never seen the mention of "white criminals." Obviously, there is a reason for why certain crimes are done by certain groups and I'm not sure why you expect the news to discuss this. Why aren't most corporate crimes done by minorities? Why does lower class crime have a larger proportion for minorities? I know you WNs don't believe in it, but there is such as thing as classism, and I think may even suffer from it, to an extent. Anyway, for the most part, the news' job is to report what happens, and that is what they do. However, and I think you'll agree, but not for the same reasons, is they entirely corrupt and rely on their sponsors too much.
You're the one who doesn't 'get it', blahblahblah123B. Survival necessarily means exploiting one's environment to their own best interests. Ideally, we would have a White culture; instead, we have to make do with the multiculturalist mess that has been foisted upon us. Why should I go out of my way to get a job under a White employer, when most such White employers in my area are Liberals? Working for a shabboth goy would hardly be an ethical improvement over working for a non-White.
As for Geocities, I was quite careful not to violate any of their rules. I'm also quite careful not to violate Canada's hate crime laws. The trouble is, all a White person needs to do is fail to be ashamed of his or her self and their race, and they are categorized as a hate criminal. The Geocities' TOS said they would deactivate any account that they felt violated the letter or the spirit of their TOS. Thus, abiding by their every rule was insufficient; simply having a pro-White site was evidently sufficiently 'against the spirit' of their TOS, even without an actual violation of any rules.
The Jews do not limit their infiltration to governments; who writes the TOS for online services? Even the Stormfront registration form makes signees agree not to post anything 'racially objectionable', 'defamatory', etc., etc.
"Why aren't most corporate crimes done by minorities?" How many 'minorities' have the intellectual ability to attain a corporate power position? Most serial killers are White, you know; it takes a certain level of intelligence to be able to repeatedly commit murders and stay free long enough to strike again and again. Blacks are far more likely to be violent; also far more likely to get caught.
I just looked at your Xanga blog, and I only see two entries; the most recent being dated June 20th and complaining about me and Hatred_is_Purity. "Exterminance has deleted my comments too. No wonder they're called nazis." An ironic remark, considering what you've had to say about Geocities deactivating my account.
If there's any substance to you, why don't you actually maintain your blog? Or did you only sign up to harass others?
I support you and agree with every thing. You are on the right path stay that path and may God be with you. 88
Hello. I am an American Nationalist, you and Hatred_is_purity's posts are the best things for the movwement yet. Intelligent explanations, that's what we need. I am also interested in learning about the movement as it exists in Canada, is there just as a racial frustration?
WHITE POWER
I'm personally a "Leftie" myself. At least in the way you have described it. I am devoid of any "racist" thoguts. I don't believe in any sort of religon either. But although I am against your you opinions, I without a doubt respect them.
With that said, first, I believe that what you sated on Communism was based on a missconception of some sort. You see, the reason Communism and these Marxist ideas haven't worked in nations like China, are because Communism was conjured in Europe, mostly Germany, in the late-1700's to mid-1800's, so when applied, as you said, ignorantly to a nation that has hundres times the population that Communism was meant to be in, it fails miserably. Lenin's ideas were really worthless to a place like China, and Marx's original idea's would have worked better in Russia. (As oppposed to Lennin's)
I believe Communism was meant to devolop into a society that was to be almost ideal for a world with a lesser population. Small communities that would work within themselves to provide for eachother, yet still nationless, which from reading your racial beliefs you would be strongly against. If Marx or any of the other originaters of Communism could have forseen even half of the phylisophical advancents and technological advancments ect. that have been established, Communism would have a chance at working. Somone could obviously come along and advance on that, which Lennin obviously tried and faield at doing, but no one has managed to pull this off.
True Communists are holding on to that idea that the beliefs could be built on, and maybe end up being toatally devoid of a lot of original texts. Wheather or not this is possible, for us to state either way would be more ignorant than anything.
As for your belifs in general, i would like to be explained to why our world would end if it were to be void of races. Also, I'm not sure if you are one of the religous white-suprmecist types, but if you are could you explain that to me too? For instance, what in the bible is agaist racial impurities? If your not a Christian-type, fogive me for assuming.
I would love to discuss more with you, considering what my beliefs have devoloped into so far are near opposite of yours. If you care, post on my site, just for the sake of simplicity. I also have an interesting consideration about Communism and, if what I'm understading about your beliefs are true, how they could go hand in hand.
I hope you can respect me as much as I have attempted to respect you. Thanks.
You describe Communism as not working under certain conditions, notably overpopulation. Isn't the same true of democracy? Wasn't the original model of democracy only intended for a population of ten thousand, or a hundred thousand, or something in that area?
I'm not a Christian. My beliefs are based upon the religion of Nature, which is science.
Even though I label myself an 'Ultra-Conservative', Leftists occasionally point out that many of my ideals smack of Liberalism. It has been said by some that National Socialism is not truly 'far right' but more accurately represents a point where the Right and Left extremities of the political scale bend around to meet each other, making the political scale take the form of a circle rather than a straight line. Others maintain that National Socialism does not even acknowledge the 'left' or 'right' categorization of various elements of politics. National Socialism does indeed contain socialist elements, hence the latter half of the name.
I rant against Liberals, but it would be more accurate to label those I rant against as 'Neo-Liberals'. The original Liberal was simply a person who valued freedom. The original Liberal could be an explorer, an inventor, an adventurer, a conqueror. But the modern Liberal, or Neo-Liberal, is a creature which only believes it is 'free' if it is actively using that freedom to do something stupid or harmful, thereby proving by such action that it is indeed free. Obviously, that is not 'freedom' at all, but enslavement to the notion that one is not truly free unless doing something to prove that freedom.
The modern Liberal, the Neo-Liberal, is a herd animal. It must dress as the others dress. It must talk as the others talk. It must 'rebel' as the others 'rebel'. The modern Liberal, the Neo-Liberal, is a lemming. It hastens to join its fellow herd-animals in their mad rush to their own destruction. The modern Liberals, the Neo-Liberals, are obedient cattle, faithful guinea pigs. They worship the television, sit and gaze adoringly into its face for hours on end, and allow it to shape their perceptions and actions, their ideals and policies.
You call yourself a 'Leftie'. Do you follow the original ideals of Liberalism, that love for, pursuit of, and respect for, freedom? Do you explore, invent, adventure and conquer? Or do you parrot the pretty platitudes of the happy hippies, throw 'peace' signs in the air and cry "Peace, love, equality, and bash in the heads of the Nazis"?
Comments are closed.