I've never really studied art history in any professional manner; just read numerous books on the subject. Bosch, Dali, Magritte, and Escher were all favorites of mine.

heresnatasha: "here's some of the bigger inventions that blacks have done over the years: air conditioning unit, stove, refrigerator, traffic light, typewriter, stethoscope, motor, mail box, elevator, clothes dryer, cellular phone, door knob, peanut butter, pencil sharpener, lawn mower, gas mask, fire extinguisher, horse shoe, hair brush, bicycle frame"

Prove it, sugar. Peanut butter may be excluded, as it is a recipe, not an invention, and was used by the Incas of South America first. Though I must say that Finnishing Rain left out a rather important note which the original text included in brackets: the passage quoted referred specifically to the African Negro, not the African-American, which is racially different from the African because of selective breeding during the slave era and a certain amount of White genes from race-mixing.

heresnatasha: "Honestly I can say that there's races that I dislike, too. But my whole philosophy is you can't judge someone until you sit down and have a conversation with them one on one. So until you've sat down with EVERY BLACK PERSON IN THE ENTIRE WORLD...I don't think you can say shit about them. And this goes for every race."

Actually, generalizations can and must be made. Blacks make up only twelve percent of the American population, yet they make up seventy percent of the American prison population. Thus, it is fair to say that Blacks have a greater tendency than Whites to be criminally inclined.

African-American Blacks have an average IQ between 85 and 90. That doesn't mean there aren't some Black geniuses out there; it does however make for an alarming proportion of distressingly not-too-bright individuals.

heresnatasha: "Like honestly, I think the people that racists hate are the ones that fit the stereotype of their race."

Well, that would make sense. As far as I can tell, most WNs who hate Blacks are those who live near ghettos, and have been exposed to the violence and crime associated with ghetto Blacks.

heresnatasha: "And its like, I'm not proud to be black, I'm proud to be me, you know?"

The first thought that comes to my mind is, it's hard to be proud to be Black because of the way most Blacks are. There's not much room for neutrality; if you're neither proud nor ashamed of your race, it would suggest that you don't identify with your race.

But if you're intelligent, decent, nonviolent, and otherwise an outstanding individual, why not associate with other similar Blacks, promote your standards among other Blacks... be proud of who and what you are, and try to turn the rest of your race into something to be proud of as well?

heresnatasha: "And OF COURSE blacks make up 70% of the prison population. In my opinion, blacks commit a lot of crimes, therefore they are targeted. So its just one continuous circle. And now the more I look into it, there is no justification for the way SOME African-Americans act today. And all that “We were slaves and they’re always trying to hold the black man down…” That is complete BULLSHIT. I was never a slave. And I don’t know a single black person today that was. Preaching about the superiority of one race over another isn’t going to do anything. Until every person in the US is educated with at least a Highschool education, and has a paying job, then I think every race needs improvement."

Most of us in the White Nationalist movement aren't supremacists. Many of us do consider our race or culture to be superior to others in various ways. However, our chief focus is not superiority; it is simply the preservation of our cultural integrity. We don't want our race or culture to be swallowed up into an amalgam of encroaching cultures and races, which is what the multiculturalist craze is bent on doing.

heresnatasha: "By the way Exterminance, my IQ is 141 "

Not bad. Beat me by a few points... mine is 127.

Here's a question for you... a rather general question... what are your thoughts on the concept of racial equality?

Xo_A_2tHe_LyS_2tHe_Sa_Ox: "Who is this? lol n what does *Bushy* mean? <333"

I was just scanning your Xanga, my 'bushy' comment referred to your hair. I think I found your Xanga on a link from Rob's (Skinhead1488).

heresnatasha: "I think equality should be based on class, not race. There are three classes of people no matter what culture you’re looking at; upper, middle, and lower. I mean, I feel completely equal to everyone in my neighborhood. We all paid the same amount of money for our houses and we're all in the same situations, regardless of race. And that’s what I don’t get. In my opinion, everyone who chooses not to associate with someone else because of race, sex, or creed… in the long run, you’re limiting yourself. For all you know, that Mexican down the street could be one of the greatest people you’ll ever meet."

I think a lot of people are confused by the basic concept of equality. For most people, the slogan seems to be 'Everyone is equal!', i.e., no matter what race you are, we all have the same abilities. Your opening words are: 'I think equality should be based on...', which seems to infer that you think equality is not something that just is, but rather something that somebody plans out.

I myself do not believe in racial equality; I believe that every race has its own trademark set of abilities and limitations. The people of some races will be better at accomplishing certain things than the people of other races. Most anti-racists, upon hearing this from me, will quickly say "That's BS! We're all the same, everyone is equal!" And they usually can't expailn why everyone is equal, but most often will assert that they very much believe it's true... they defend their beliefs in much the same way Christians do: they can't prove it, but they sure believe it.

heresnatasha: "I’m a firm believer in “everything happens for a reason” and that every race originated from one in the beginning. Honestly, since a lot of people are going interracial, I think we may just be going back to that. And if that is what’s meant to happen, then it’s inevitable."

Cats and dogs shared a common ancestor. They have long since evolved their own distinct races, some of which can interbreed; look up the cross-breeding of the lion and the tiger, and the resulting 'Liger'. But... the canine and feline branches are now so different, a wolf and a tiger could not bear offspring together.

But, at one point in evolution, the ancestors of cats and dogs were still similar enough to one another that they could have interbred. And what would have happened if they had all done that? Well, we wouldn't have two distinct groups of cats and dogs. Maybe on, maybe the other, maybe a creature that looked something halfway between the two... but not both.

It's the same with humans. We've evolved into separate races, each with their own distinct characteristics and abilities. At this point, the races are still closely related enough that they can interbreed... and by interbreeding, lose their distinct characteristics and specialized abilities. Interbreeding between two remotely related races causes the gene-splicing to fall back on the more primitive tried-tested-and true traits. For example, the Black race is the oldest race and the White race is the youngest; Blacks mixing with Whites tend to produce children that are more similar to the Black parent than to the White one. Thus, race-mixing promotes genetic regression; much of the evolutionary progress attained by the White race is lost through interbreeding.

Yes, everything happens for a reason. For millions upon millions of years, evolution has been a haphazard course of birth, life, and death, the mutations more suited to their environments prevailing over the mutations not beneficial to survival. Now the human has evolved, a creature that has the intellectual ability to devise a means of controlling evolution. Yes... now that we are mapping genomes, cloning livestock, and learning the whys and wherefores and hows of genetics, genetic engineering can allow us to design new features for life-forms, for our livestock or for ourselves. In addition to genetic engineering, there is the science of eugenics; a popular form of eugenics is the sterilization of anyone with an IQ of less than 100 or with debilitating genetic defects, and the giving of incentive to those with spectacularly high IQs to have more children. Millions of years of haphazard, happenstance evolution have at last given rise to a creature with the potential to take its own genetic destiny into its hands. But racemixing could ruin this possibility for us.

heresnatasha: "So I say live your life to the fullest and accept things as they are. By the way, I read some of “The 88 PRECEPTS”. Those are pretty… interesting. It actually sounds a little fishy to me. But then again…that’s just me, and who am I to tell you what to believe in."

The 88 Precepts were composed by David Lane. They can be considered a distilled version of the Twenty-Five Points of the National Socialist Party of Germany. They're all pretty good, but lately I've been especially focused on the Precepts in the 40s and 50s range, which deal with the topic of governance.

heresnatasha: "Oh, I have a question that I’ve always been meaning to ask someone. What’s with the hatred of Jews? I just never understood that."

Every race has its own trademark abilities and limits, as I mentioned before; they tend to have their own behavioural patterns and codes of ethics, as well. The Jew has an average IQ of 115, the highest racial average - compare to the White average of 100 and the Asian average of 110. But a high IQ isn't everything. The Jew has been bred to despise hard, honest labor. They prefer jobs involving money, law, religion and government; and they are very good at these jobs. They are also spectacularly good at making people believe lies. Jews make up less than four percent of the American population; yet, they made up sixty percent of Clinton's cabinet, and forty percent of Bush's. They tend to have a greater loyalty towards Israel than towards America. Billions of American taxpayer's dollars flood annually into Israel... Israel uses this to fuel their war machine... then, when September Eleventh rolled around, the Americans cried out, "Why? Why?"

Why, America? The blood of Palestine cries out from the ground because your tax dollars have spilled it; and you ask 'Why?' when it comes back to slap you in the face?

The evil of the Jews is seemingly boundless. They have sparked a war between Man and Woman in the West; thanks to Gloria Steinem and her ilk promoting 'feminism', which supposedly 'liberates' women but in fact alienates them from men. A 'woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle'? Child-bearing is a shameful thing? Lunacy, utter lunacy! But the Jew uses sweet words to make us swallow foul things.

Most societies, tribes, and cultures are naturally Conservative in their conduct; for Conservatism is what binds a people together. Jews have been promoting neo-Liberalism in the West for ages.

Normally, I just say 'Liberal'. But sometimes it is necessary to point out that the original Liberal was simply a person who excercised freedom of thought and action. Many true Liberals were inventors, discoverers, explorers.

But the modern Liberal or 'Neo-Liberal' is a very different creature. It does not believe it is free unless it is using that freedom to do something harmful or stupid, thereby 'proving' itself to be free - actually, enslaving itself to a false concept of freedom. The neo-Liberal is a mindless herd animal. It must dress as the others dress, it must talk as the others talk, it must act and think as the others act and think. It is a willing slave to peer-pressure; a cowering animal that fears rejection should it dare to truly think for itself or act differently from its fellow herd-animals.

The Jew promotes and enforces this kind of Liberalism in Western Society because it creates a useful tool: a massive herd of people who will do whatever the powers that be want them to do. They vote for who they're supposed to vote for. They condemn what they're supposed to condemn. And they spend long hours watching the television, which is one of the chief tools used to control their minds (The 46th Precept: In a democracy those who control the media, and thus the minds of the electorate, have power undreamed of by kings or dictators.)

I could speak til doomsday and not catalogue all the evils of the Jew. I hope what little I've listed here can give you a picture of what sparks my ire against them.